Regarding your latest publication, I note that you fail to understand deontology's basis in the categorical imperative, which intimately defines moral agency within psychic parameters. I note you also fail to understand utilitarianism's distinct measurement of energy, efficiency, and conservation in its utility equation.
Well your opinion is stupid and you are wrong and a bad person.
Regarding your latest publication, I note that you fail to understand deontology's basis in the categorical imperative, which intimately defines moral agency within psychic parameters. I note you also fail to understand utilitarianism's distinct measurement of energy, efficiency, and conservation in its utility equation.
The rest is fine.